"Basically, a rear-facing child safety features, especially during a frontal crash advan-tages, since the load is transmitted over a wide area across the back of the child and thus no increase in neck forces may occur".
http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=bg&ie= … 8q5v9fG6s5myk8xmg
"50% Hybrid III adult dummy, where the biomechanical loads on the head, neck, chest, pelvis and legs are measured, and the rear with two child dummies, each an average 1 Ѕ and 3 years child match"
http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=bg&ie= … mCQBW52l3pMLrj2-Q
- Натоварванията на врата се мерят само в куклите симулиращи възрастен пасажер, детските кукли нямат такива. По-долу има текст и за детската безопасност при краш теста и не се споменават датчици и самите те казват, че теста е субективен и резултатите от реалния живот могат да са съвсем различни.
"Some only so-called field tests will be performed, although the handling of
Child seats take into account, but do not include crash-test examinations. But also different Crashkon-
configurations (such as impact velocity, sitting or sleeping position, one or more attempts, etc."
http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=bg&ie= … lTUSfHTnBPqWQ7i9Q
"Testing and safety: People who know a lot about car seats basically disregard testing. Testing by organisations is flawed, biased and subjective. No two tests are ever done the same so they can't be compared.All car seats in Europe have to pass ECE R44 which is good and quite strict.
Testing of car seats is very biased which explain why an average forward facing seat can receive 75/100 points why an excellent rear facing seat can receive 35/100 points. The rear facing seat is still 500% safer. It's very confusing for customers.
There is a heavy bias toward forward facing seats in the countries where the testing is done (UK, Germany, Austria, etc). People who perform the testing almost always show an embarrassingly poor knowledge of the seats and rear facing in general. The tests results of rear facing seats are often entertaining and laughable to read for those who know extensive knowledge of car seat safety. Pushing forward facing seats is just an easier way to do business.
I sat rear facing in 1967 in one of the first seats made (Klippan). It was a very simple seat which worked well. If this seat could be used today it would be far safer than the best forward facing seat made in 2011. It would not be as great as other rear facing seats made today, due to new materials etc., but it would offer very good protection."
http://www.car-seat.org/showthread.php?t=159557
"here is the low down on ADAC testing of rearfacing seats.
Exsample: Multi-Tech.
Multi-Tech was tested according to the "Worst Case Scenerio" as is all rearfacing seats.
This is how it was tested:
Frontal Impact:
Forward facing with dummies: Q1, Q3 (harnessed) & Q6 (booster)
Rearfacing with dummy: Q6
Side impact:
Forward facing: Q1, Q3 (harnessed) Q6 (booster)
Rearfacing: Q3 & Q6
The seat is supposd to be installed with no more than a 1 cm gap between the MT and the frontseat. ADAC had removed the front seat!!!!
Furthermore the seatbelt instal was slightly wrong.
Since it is the worst case scenerio, the final result that you see, is the result of forward facing testing and the "complicateed" installation in rearfacing mode
I think we all know that people who want thei child to sit forwardfacing, would never throw their money at the Multi-Tech because it is somewhat more exspensive than itsґ forward facing counterpart: The Britax Evolva
The ADAC test results are completely meaningless for these reasons.
On top of that they unrightfully give parents the wrong impression of the rearfacing seats, and lead them to buy less safe seats to put it bluntly"
http://www.car-seat.org/showthread.php?t=159557
Ето и описание на процедурата използвана от ADAC за детската безопасност в автомобила
"Child Safety
The addition has come since December 2003 on child safety includes an examination of the vehicle relative to the general conditions for the easy installation of child safety seats, as well as frontal and side crash tests, each with two child seats recommended by the vehicle manufacturer. There are children's dummies, each corresponding to an average 1 1/2 and 3 year old child used.
In addition to the suitability of the safety belts (geometry) for attachment of various schemes the child seat for the passenger airbag deactivation system and the legal notice in the vehicle and on the child seat is evaluated.
The assessment of child safety indicates how well the respective car model, the conditions are in place that children can be safely transported. It refers also to the particular combination of car seat and vehicle. The child seats are used, therefore, indicated by the test. When child safety can as usual maximum of 49 points are reached.
As the use of other children sitting quite different results can be achieved, should always be checked whether the car seat is appropriate and stable fit in the car can be. "
http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=bg&ie= … mCQBW52l3pMLrj2-Q
Важното е пропуснато..... дават се и се отнемат точки за неща, които нямат общо с врата- етикети, колани, начини на монтаж и т.н.