За да напишат в изявлението си, че нито правителството, нито кралицата имат права върху думата "роял" значи юристите им са го проверили. Съмнявам се, че са си наели какви да е юристи.
Виж целия пост
Кралски работи и клюки - февруари 2020
- Публикувана: 1 фев. 2020, 00:10 ч.
- Последно мнение: 1 март 2020, 08:37 ч.
# 2 821
22 фев. 2020, 23:17 ч.
В законите пише друго.
Има си регулации и правила за цялата тая работа:
https://www.royal.uk/sites/default/files/media/royal_arms_blue_booklet20152.pdf
Но всеки има право на мнение, в крайна сметка.
Аз все пак не успях да разбера, защо искат да са Роял, при положение че мразят Монархията и кралския живот.
Нали тая среда бе токсична и расистка. Защо, по дяволите, би искал да имаш марка, в чието име присъства думата Роял. Голям когнитивен дисонанс е цялата тая война, която водят Хари и Маркъл със семейството на Хари.
Виж целия пост
Има си регулации и правила за цялата тая работа:
https://www.royal.uk/sites/default/files/media/royal_arms_blue_booklet20152.pdf
Но всеки има право на мнение, в крайна сметка.
Аз все пак не успях да разбера, защо искат да са Роял, при положение че мразят Монархията и кралския живот.
Нали тая среда бе токсична и расистка. Защо, по дяволите, би искал да имаш марка, в чието име присъства думата Роял. Голям когнитивен дисонанс е цялата тая война, която водят Хари и Маркъл със семейството на Хари.
# 2 822
22 фев. 2020, 23:33 ч.
Не се наемам да чета между редовете и да сравнявам. НО, това, което се публикува в сайта на Х&М не е нещо, изтървано случайно от Меган. Това е нещо съгласувано с Хари и с екип. Т.е., ако между редовете евентуално пише, че Кралицата не може да ги ограничи да ползват "роял", то това са мисли и на Хари, не само на Меган, а вероятно и на съветниците им. Но пак - ако изобщо са искали това да кажат.
В Телеграф не мога да чета без регистрация, а не ми се регистрира.
Виж целия пост
В Телеграф не мога да чета без регистрация, а не ми се регистрира.
# 2 823
22 фев. 2020, 23:35 ч.
Те колко неща писаха на сайта си, които после се оказаха неверни и/или недообмислени.😅
На мен ми е странно, че изобщо споменават легално ли е да ползват "royal" или не. Нали уж искат да се развивават самостоятелно и отделно от КС, та е логично да си кръстят бранда/фондацията/дружеството/там каквото ще правят с име, което не се свързва с монархията.
Виж целия пост
На мен ми е странно, че изобщо споменават легално ли е да ползват "royal" или не. Нали уж искат да се развивават самостоятелно и отделно от КС, та е логично да си кръстят бранда/фондацията/дружеството/там каквото ще правят с име, което не се свързва с монархията.
# 2 824
22 фев. 2020, 23:38 ч.
Ако законът е на тяхна страна, тогава могат да заведат дело.
Виж целия пост
# 2 825
22 фев. 2020, 23:38 ч.
Лили, написали са, че Монархията няма юрисдикция да забранява употребата на думата Ройъл отвъд океана. И това е така. Даже е меко казано. Баба изобщо няма права над думата Ройъл, тя е добила общоизвестност и утвърденост и не може да бъде запазена за никого, дори и в UK.
Да не говорим, че Royal има и много по-широка етимология: например в royal jelly , където става дума за пчелен продукт от пчели-майки (кралици). Птица даде чудесен пример с Royal Canin(там пък става дума за знатно (кралско) кучешко потекло и т.н. ), а има и много други фирми, брандове и организации с Royal в името и то без никаква връзка с Уиндзорите. Светът отдавна не се върти около тях и монархията, но те още не са го разбрали.
И с royal, и без, двамата ще си градят живота самостоятелно. Желая им успех.
Даже е по-добре така, няма да ги одумват, че се възползват от кралските връзки.
Всъщност не, ще ги одумват при всички положения, но ...haters gonna hate, какво да се прави.
Виж целия пост
За да напишат в изявлението си, че нито правителството, нито кралицата имат права върху думата "роял" значи юристите им са го проверили. Съмнявам се, че са си наели какви да е юристи.
Да не говорим, че Royal има и много по-широка етимология: например в royal jelly , където става дума за пчелен продукт от пчели-майки (кралици). Птица даде чудесен пример с Royal Canin(там пък става дума за знатно (кралско) кучешко потекло и т.н. ), а има и много други фирми, брандове и организации с Royal в името и то без никаква връзка с Уиндзорите. Светът отдавна не се върти около тях и монархията, но те още не са го разбрали.
И с royal, и без, двамата ще си градят живота самостоятелно. Желая им успех.
Даже е по-добре така, няма да ги одумват, че се възползват от кралските връзки.
Всъщност не, ще ги одумват при всички положения, но ...haters gonna hate, какво да се прави.
# 2 826
22 фев. 2020, 23:40 ч.
В скритите текстове са целите, предполагам, статии.
Виж целия пост
В Телеграф не мога да чета без регистрация, а не ми се регистрира.
В скритите текстове са целите, предполагам, статии.
# 2 827
22 фев. 2020, 23:42 ч.
Според мен това с правото на използване на думата го коментираха в изявлението си, заради публикациите в медиите, че кралицата им била забранила да ползват думата "роял".
Виж целия пост
Те колко неща писаха на сайта си, които после се оказаха неверни и/или недообмислени.😅
На мен ми е странно, че изобщо споменават легално ли е да ползват "royal" или не. Нали уж искат да се развивават самостоятелно и отделно от КС, та е логично да си кръстят бранда/фондацията/дружеството/там каквото ще правят с име, което не се свързва с монархията.
На мен ми е странно, че изобщо споменават легално ли е да ползват "royal" или не. Нали уж искат да се развивават самостоятелно и отделно от КС, та е логично да си кръстят бранда/фондацията/дружеството/там каквото ще правят с име, което не се свързва с монархията.
Според мен това с правото на използване на думата го коментираха в изявлението си, заради публикациите в медиите, че кралицата им била забранила да ползват думата "роял".
# 2 828
22 фев. 2020, 23:44 ч.
Да, възможно е.
Eleonora, къде във файла, който сложи да търся за употребата на royal от неработещи рояли?
Виж целия пост
Eleonora, къде във файла, който сложи да търся за употребата на royal от неработещи рояли?
# 2 829
22 фев. 2020, 23:46 ч.
Не е така зад океана. Има международни споразумения, които страните зад океана са подписали.
Пак повтарям, че ако законът бе на тяхна страна, могат да заведат дело.
И пак повтарям, че на Хари и на Маркъл им пожелавам успех във всички начинания зад океана.
Виж целия пост
Пак повтарям, че ако законът бе на тяхна страна, могат да заведат дело.
И пак повтарям, че на Хари и на Маркъл им пожелавам успех във всички начинания зад океана.
Да, възможно е.
Eleonora, къде във файла, който сложи да търся за употребата на royal от неработещи рояли?
Eleonora, къде във файла, който сложи да търся за употребата на royal от неработещи рояли?
Скрит текст:
Guidance on the Use of Royal Arms, Names and Images
The following booklet summarises the legal position governing the use, for commercial purposes, of the Royal Arms, Royal Devices, Emblems and Titles and of photographs, portraits, engravings, effigies and busts of The Queen and Members of the Royal Family.
Guidance on advertising in which reference is made to a Member of the Royal Family, and on the use of images of Members of the Royal Family on articles for sale, is also provided.
The Lord Chamberlain’s Office will be pleased to provide guidance when it is unclear as to whether the use of “Arms” etc., may give the impression that there is a Royal connection.
TRADE MARKS
Section 4 (1) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 states:
“A trade mark which consists of or contains –
(a) the Royal arms, or any of the principal armorial bearings of the Royal arms, or any insignia or device so nearly resembling the Royal arms or any such armorial bearing as to be likely to be mistaken for them or it,
(b) a representation of the Royal crown or any of the Royal flags,
© a representation of Her Majesty or any Member of the Royal Family, or any colourable imitation thereof, or
(d) words, letters or devices likely to lead persons to think that the applicant either has or recently has had Royal patronage or authorisation,
shall not be registered unless it appears to the registrar that consent has been given by or on behalf of Her Majesty or, as the case may be, the relevant Member of the Royal Family.”
The Lord Chamberlain’s Office is empowered to grant the consent referred to in Section 4(1) on behalf of Her Majesty The Queen. The Lord Chamberlain’s Office has a standard procedure and document to implement the grant of any such consent. The consent is conditional on (inter alia) the proprietary rights in the registration remaining with the applicant, and cannot be assigned without further consent.
Unauthorised Use
Section 99(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 states that “a person shall not without the authority of Her Majesty use in connection with any business the Royal arms (or arms so closely resembling the Royal arms as to be calculated to deceive) in such manner as to be calculated to lead to the belief that he is duly authorised to use the Royal arms”.
International Protection
The use of certain Royal insignia as trade marks can also be protected internationally under the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property of 1883.
Article 6ter (1) (a) of the Paris Convention states that:
“The countries of the Union agree to refuse or to invalidate the registration, and to prohibit by appropriate measures the use, without authorization by the competent authorities, either as trademarks or as elements of trademarks, of armorial bearings, flags, and other State emblems, of the countries of the Union, official signs and hallmarks indicating control and warranty adopted by them, and any imitation from a heraldic point of view”.
All the countries which are contracting parties to the Paris Convention undertake not to register trade marks which incorporate or imitate State emblems, armorial bearings, official signs or hallmarks, which are designated as protected emblems under the Convention, without evidence of content to the registration for the appropriate“competent authority”.
There are currently 173 member states that are party to the Paris Convention and bound by this provision (Annex A). Several versions of the Royal arms (including the Supporters) are protected as UK state emblems under the Paris Convention.
Trade Descriptions Act 1968
Section 12 states that:
“If any person, in the course of any trade or business, gives, by whatever means, any false indication, direct or indirect, that any goods or services supplied by him or any methods adopted by him are or are of a kind supplied to or approved by Her Majesty or any member of the Royal Family, he shall, subject to the provisions of this Act, be guilty of an offence”.
Royal Warrants
When Royal Patronage is granted, for instance a Tradesmen’s Warrant, the Royal Arms may be displayed in certain instances, as laid down in the Lord Chamberlain’s Rules for holders of a Tradesmen’s Warrant. However they may not be used as a trade mark and should only be displayed for the duration of the grant of a Royal Warrant.
The Lord Chamberlain’s Office will be pleased to provide guidance if required.
NAMES OF THE ROYAL FAMILY
Names of the Royal Family may not be registered in, or as, trade marks without the consent of The Queen or the relevant Member of the Royal Family. The names of Members of the Royal Family are listed at Annex C. The names of Royal Residences may not be registered either.
In addition to the possibility of an objection under Section 3(5) Trade Marks Act 1994, Trade Mark examiners will also consider whether the application has been made in bad faith (Section 3(6) and whether the mark is distinctive for the goods/services (Section 3(1)
Trade Marks incorporating the word Royal
Section 4 of the Trade Marks Act related to the use of any words, in such a manner as to be likely to lead persons to think that the applicant either has, or recently has had, Royal patronage or authorization.
Examples of goods or services for which ROYAL may indicate Royal patronage are high quality porcelain or glassware, luxury foods, organic food, confectionery, alcoholic beverages, clothing, organisation of sporting events, exhibitions, flower shows, tourism, medical and charitable services. This is not an exhaustive list.
ROYAL may indicate royal patronage or authorisation for other high value products, or prestige or ‘public interest’ type services.
ROYAL is unlikely to indicate Royal patronage or authorisation for everyday items e.g. insurance or financial services, double glazing services, provision of electricity, or for goods which are far enough removed from any association with the Royal family such as skateboards, computers, computer games or T-shirts.
Company Names
Sections 55 and 1047 of the Companies Act 2006 and Regulation 8 of the Limited Liability Partnerships (Application of Companies Act 2006) Regulations 2009 prohibits companies (including overseas companies) and limited liability partnerships from being registered under a name which includes any of the sensitive words specified in the Company, Limited Liability Partnership and Business Names (Sensitive Words and Expressions) Regulations 2014, unless the approval of the Secretary of State has been obtained. The sensitive words specified in the 2014 Regulations include Royal, Queen, King, Prince or Princess.
Section 1194 of the Companies Act 2006 provides that it is an offence to carry on any type of business (to include a company (including an overseas), limited liability partnership or any other type of business) under a name which includes any of the sensitive words specified in the Company, Limited Liability Partnership and Business Names (Sensitive Words and Expressions) Regulations 2014, unless the approval of the Secretary of State has been obtained. See: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/incorporation-and-names
To use these words in a company or business name, you must obtain the consent of the body shown below:-
*Can be found on website link above as I omitted it here
Products
Using Royal names or Royal residences on products, rather than as part of a Company’s name, is illegal if the use of the name suggests the goods have some connection with or are supplied to a Member of the Royal Family.
It is only proposed to vary these rules on occasional events of national importance.
ROYAL IMAGES
Royal images include representations of The Queen, any Member of the Royal Family (Annex D) and Royal Residences (Annex E).
Trade Marks
Trade Marks containing representations of Her Majesty, or any member of the Royal Family or royal Residences are open to objection under section 3(5) of the Trade Mark Act 1994 unless the consent of The Queen or the relevant member of the Royal Family is provided.
Products
The Lord Chamberlain’s Office will not generally seek to oppose the use of images of Members of the Royal Family or Royal Residences on certain articles which are for sale, providing they are of a permanent kind, free from advertisement, in good taste, carry no implication that the firm concerned has received Royal Custom or approval, and are not in contravention of any trademark or copyright.
However, as a general rule, the Lord Chamberlain’s Office does not consider that Royal Images should be used on the following:-
Medals, medallions and coins
(which are not issued by The Queen or are legal tender) Adhesive seals
Articles of dress
Household linen and furnishing fabrics
Packaging, containers, boxes, covers or labels
If it is intended to show the image of The Queen or a Member of the Royal Family with that of a person who is not a Member of the Royal Family, then it is suggested that specific advice should be sought from the Lord Chamberlain’s Office.
Images of Members of the Royal Family under the age of 18 should not be used for commercial purposes.
Any question of copyright involved in the reproduction of a Royal Image must be settled by the prospective user directly with the copyright holder.
Nothing in these rules gives any right to the use of any particular Image.
It is only proposed to vary these rules on occasional events of national importance.
Advertising
The Advertising Standards Authority issues specific guidelines which cover the use of Royal Images in advertising, but generally, except when advertising a book, newspaper article or magazine article about a Member of the Royal Family, Royal Images may not be used for advertising purposes in any medium.
A firm’s advertisement may not include photographs of Members of the Royal Family visiting their works or exhibition stands, or being publicly involved with their goods or services. Such matters may then be referred to the Advertising Standards Authority or the Director General of Fair Trading under the control of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 or the Business Protection from Misleading Marketing Regulations 2008.
The article also shows pictorial images of Coats of Arms and information on Legal Tender here which I have omitted but can be seen by clicking on the link at the top of the article
The following booklet summarises the legal position governing the use, for commercial purposes, of the Royal Arms, Royal Devices, Emblems and Titles and of photographs, portraits, engravings, effigies and busts of The Queen and Members of the Royal Family.
Guidance on advertising in which reference is made to a Member of the Royal Family, and on the use of images of Members of the Royal Family on articles for sale, is also provided.
The Lord Chamberlain’s Office will be pleased to provide guidance when it is unclear as to whether the use of “Arms” etc., may give the impression that there is a Royal connection.
TRADE MARKS
Section 4 (1) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 states:
“A trade mark which consists of or contains –
(a) the Royal arms, or any of the principal armorial bearings of the Royal arms, or any insignia or device so nearly resembling the Royal arms or any such armorial bearing as to be likely to be mistaken for them or it,
(b) a representation of the Royal crown or any of the Royal flags,
© a representation of Her Majesty or any Member of the Royal Family, or any colourable imitation thereof, or
(d) words, letters or devices likely to lead persons to think that the applicant either has or recently has had Royal patronage or authorisation,
shall not be registered unless it appears to the registrar that consent has been given by or on behalf of Her Majesty or, as the case may be, the relevant Member of the Royal Family.”
The Lord Chamberlain’s Office is empowered to grant the consent referred to in Section 4(1) on behalf of Her Majesty The Queen. The Lord Chamberlain’s Office has a standard procedure and document to implement the grant of any such consent. The consent is conditional on (inter alia) the proprietary rights in the registration remaining with the applicant, and cannot be assigned without further consent.
Unauthorised Use
Section 99(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 states that “a person shall not without the authority of Her Majesty use in connection with any business the Royal arms (or arms so closely resembling the Royal arms as to be calculated to deceive) in such manner as to be calculated to lead to the belief that he is duly authorised to use the Royal arms”.
International Protection
The use of certain Royal insignia as trade marks can also be protected internationally under the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property of 1883.
Article 6ter (1) (a) of the Paris Convention states that:
“The countries of the Union agree to refuse or to invalidate the registration, and to prohibit by appropriate measures the use, without authorization by the competent authorities, either as trademarks or as elements of trademarks, of armorial bearings, flags, and other State emblems, of the countries of the Union, official signs and hallmarks indicating control and warranty adopted by them, and any imitation from a heraldic point of view”.
All the countries which are contracting parties to the Paris Convention undertake not to register trade marks which incorporate or imitate State emblems, armorial bearings, official signs or hallmarks, which are designated as protected emblems under the Convention, without evidence of content to the registration for the appropriate“competent authority”.
There are currently 173 member states that are party to the Paris Convention and bound by this provision (Annex A). Several versions of the Royal arms (including the Supporters) are protected as UK state emblems under the Paris Convention.
Trade Descriptions Act 1968
Section 12 states that:
“If any person, in the course of any trade or business, gives, by whatever means, any false indication, direct or indirect, that any goods or services supplied by him or any methods adopted by him are or are of a kind supplied to or approved by Her Majesty or any member of the Royal Family, he shall, subject to the provisions of this Act, be guilty of an offence”.
Royal Warrants
When Royal Patronage is granted, for instance a Tradesmen’s Warrant, the Royal Arms may be displayed in certain instances, as laid down in the Lord Chamberlain’s Rules for holders of a Tradesmen’s Warrant. However they may not be used as a trade mark and should only be displayed for the duration of the grant of a Royal Warrant.
The Lord Chamberlain’s Office will be pleased to provide guidance if required.
NAMES OF THE ROYAL FAMILY
Names of the Royal Family may not be registered in, or as, trade marks without the consent of The Queen or the relevant Member of the Royal Family. The names of Members of the Royal Family are listed at Annex C. The names of Royal Residences may not be registered either.
In addition to the possibility of an objection under Section 3(5) Trade Marks Act 1994, Trade Mark examiners will also consider whether the application has been made in bad faith (Section 3(6) and whether the mark is distinctive for the goods/services (Section 3(1)
Trade Marks incorporating the word Royal
Section 4 of the Trade Marks Act related to the use of any words, in such a manner as to be likely to lead persons to think that the applicant either has, or recently has had, Royal patronage or authorization.
Examples of goods or services for which ROYAL may indicate Royal patronage are high quality porcelain or glassware, luxury foods, organic food, confectionery, alcoholic beverages, clothing, organisation of sporting events, exhibitions, flower shows, tourism, medical and charitable services. This is not an exhaustive list.
ROYAL may indicate royal patronage or authorisation for other high value products, or prestige or ‘public interest’ type services.
ROYAL is unlikely to indicate Royal patronage or authorisation for everyday items e.g. insurance or financial services, double glazing services, provision of electricity, or for goods which are far enough removed from any association with the Royal family such as skateboards, computers, computer games or T-shirts.
Company Names
Sections 55 and 1047 of the Companies Act 2006 and Regulation 8 of the Limited Liability Partnerships (Application of Companies Act 2006) Regulations 2009 prohibits companies (including overseas companies) and limited liability partnerships from being registered under a name which includes any of the sensitive words specified in the Company, Limited Liability Partnership and Business Names (Sensitive Words and Expressions) Regulations 2014, unless the approval of the Secretary of State has been obtained. The sensitive words specified in the 2014 Regulations include Royal, Queen, King, Prince or Princess.
Section 1194 of the Companies Act 2006 provides that it is an offence to carry on any type of business (to include a company (including an overseas), limited liability partnership or any other type of business) under a name which includes any of the sensitive words specified in the Company, Limited Liability Partnership and Business Names (Sensitive Words and Expressions) Regulations 2014, unless the approval of the Secretary of State has been obtained. See: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/incorporation-and-names
To use these words in a company or business name, you must obtain the consent of the body shown below:-
*Can be found on website link above as I omitted it here
Products
Using Royal names or Royal residences on products, rather than as part of a Company’s name, is illegal if the use of the name suggests the goods have some connection with or are supplied to a Member of the Royal Family.
It is only proposed to vary these rules on occasional events of national importance.
ROYAL IMAGES
Royal images include representations of The Queen, any Member of the Royal Family (Annex D) and Royal Residences (Annex E).
Trade Marks
Trade Marks containing representations of Her Majesty, or any member of the Royal Family or royal Residences are open to objection under section 3(5) of the Trade Mark Act 1994 unless the consent of The Queen or the relevant member of the Royal Family is provided.
Products
The Lord Chamberlain’s Office will not generally seek to oppose the use of images of Members of the Royal Family or Royal Residences on certain articles which are for sale, providing they are of a permanent kind, free from advertisement, in good taste, carry no implication that the firm concerned has received Royal Custom or approval, and are not in contravention of any trademark or copyright.
However, as a general rule, the Lord Chamberlain’s Office does not consider that Royal Images should be used on the following:-
Medals, medallions and coins
(which are not issued by The Queen or are legal tender) Adhesive seals
Articles of dress
Household linen and furnishing fabrics
Packaging, containers, boxes, covers or labels
If it is intended to show the image of The Queen or a Member of the Royal Family with that of a person who is not a Member of the Royal Family, then it is suggested that specific advice should be sought from the Lord Chamberlain’s Office.
Images of Members of the Royal Family under the age of 18 should not be used for commercial purposes.
Any question of copyright involved in the reproduction of a Royal Image must be settled by the prospective user directly with the copyright holder.
Nothing in these rules gives any right to the use of any particular Image.
It is only proposed to vary these rules on occasional events of national importance.
Advertising
The Advertising Standards Authority issues specific guidelines which cover the use of Royal Images in advertising, but generally, except when advertising a book, newspaper article or magazine article about a Member of the Royal Family, Royal Images may not be used for advertising purposes in any medium.
A firm’s advertisement may not include photographs of Members of the Royal Family visiting their works or exhibition stands, or being publicly involved with their goods or services. Such matters may then be referred to the Advertising Standards Authority or the Director General of Fair Trading under the control of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 or the Business Protection from Misleading Marketing Regulations 2008.
The article also shows pictorial images of Coats of Arms and information on Legal Tender here which I have omitted but can be seen by clicking on the link at the top of the article
# 2 831
22 фев. 2020, 23:53 ч.
Половинчатите истории на Баба.Взимаш им титлите,фондовете,спираш им плащането на охраната и ги пускаш свободни в живота на обикновените хора като сем.Уиндзор.Щели да бъдат херцози,само че без Величества,година щяло да се чака,па после да се ревизира,какво има да ревизират.Сега вече няма път назад и няма как да се "важна част от РФ".След цирка на сем.Маркъл следва цирка на сем Уиндзор.
Виж целия пост
# 2 832
22 фев. 2020, 23:56 ч.
И аз съм на твоето мнение. 🙂 А с това, че светът не се върти около уважаемата Бети и родата й съм още по-съгласна. 😄 И думи ще ми забранява да се ползват, егати наглостта! 🙄
Виж целия пост
Лили, написали са, че Монархията няма юрисдикция да забранява употребата на думата Ройъл отвъд океана. И това е така. Даже е меко казано. Баба изобщо няма права над думата Ройъл, тя е добила общоизвестност и утвърденост и не може да бъде запазена за никого, дори и в UK.
Да не говорим, че Royal има и много по-широка етимология: например в royal jelly , където става дума за пчелен продукт от пчели-майки (кралици). Птица даде чудесен пример с Royal Canin(там пък става дума за знатно (кралско) кучешко потекло и т.н. ), а има и много други фирми, брандове и организации с Royal в името и то без никаква връзка с Уиндзорите. Светът отдавна не се върти около тях и монархията, но те още не са го разбрали.
И с royal, и без, двамата ще си градят живота самостоятелно. Желая им успех.
Даже е по-добре така, няма да ги одумват, че се възползват от кралските връзки.
Всъщност не, ще ги одумват при всички положения, но ...haters gonna hate, какво да се прави.
Да не говорим, че Royal има и много по-широка етимология: например в royal jelly , където става дума за пчелен продукт от пчели-майки (кралици). Птица даде чудесен пример с Royal Canin(там пък става дума за знатно (кралско) кучешко потекло и т.н. ), а има и много други фирми, брандове и организации с Royal в името и то без никаква връзка с Уиндзорите. Светът отдавна не се върти около тях и монархията, но те още не са го разбрали.
И с royal, и без, двамата ще си градят живота самостоятелно. Желая им успех.
Даже е по-добре така, няма да ги одумват, че се възползват от кралските връзки.
Всъщност не, ще ги одумват при всички положения, но ...haters gonna hate, какво да се прави.
И аз съм на твоето мнение. 🙂 А с това, че светът не се върти около уважаемата Бети и родата й съм още по-съгласна. 😄 И думи ще ми забранява да се ползват, егати наглостта! 🙄
# 2 833
22 фев. 2020, 23:57 ч.
За плащането на охраната, Баба е казала друго, а не онова, което стои в манифеста на Хари и на Маркъл.
Цитатът е от Телеграф.
За отнемане на титлите си има ред, т.е. не става толкова бързо и лесно.
Според мен, в един момент, Хари и Маркъл сами ще се откажат от титлите. Така е най-лесно и без много главоболия.
Виж целия пост
Половинчатите истории на Баба.Взимаш им титлите,фондовете,спираш им плащането на охраната и ги пускаш свободни в живота на обикновените хора като сем.Уиндзор.
Цитат
Security
PALACE: Buckingham Palace does not comment on the details of security arrangements. There are well established independent processes to determine the need for publicly-funded security.
SUSSEX: It is agreed that The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will continue to require effective security to protect them and their son. This is based on The Duke’s public profile by virtue of being born into The Royal Family, his military service, the Duchess’ own independent profile, and the shared threat and risk level documented specifically over the last few years. Neither have disclosed how this security will be paid.
PALACE: Buckingham Palace does not comment on the details of security arrangements. There are well established independent processes to determine the need for publicly-funded security.
SUSSEX: It is agreed that The Duke and Duchess of Sussex will continue to require effective security to protect them and their son. This is based on The Duke’s public profile by virtue of being born into The Royal Family, his military service, the Duchess’ own independent profile, and the shared threat and risk level documented specifically over the last few years. Neither have disclosed how this security will be paid.
Цитатът е от Телеграф.
За отнемане на титлите си има ред, т.е. не става толкова бързо и лесно.
Според мен, в един момент, Хари и Маркъл сами ще се откажат от титлите. Така е най-лесно и без много главоболия.
# 2 834
22 фев. 2020, 23:58 ч.
Елеонора, в поста ти никъде няма доказателство, че Фирмата може да забранява употребата на думата Royal по принцип. Говори се само за забрана за използване на гербове, снимки на членове на КС или знаци, навеждащи на връзка с Уиндзорите. Така че, ако обичаш, не подвеждай за пореден път.
И по-нагоре пак даваш нерелевантни линкове на Световната организация за интелектуална собственост WIPO, където няма нищо по въпроса.
Виж целия пост
И по-нагоре пак даваш нерелевантни линкове на Световната организация за интелектуална собственост WIPO, където няма нищо по въпроса.
Препоръчани теми